I don't really show the pictures of the people that interest me the most because I don't think I have the narrative to back it up in its own right yet, and flickr isn't the forum for that work either, I've kind of dug myself into a hole there withe whole street and what I defined as the kind of street I wanted in Seattle Street and which has generally become accepted as an acceptable version of that decisive, contemplative, gag, style, which doesn't really rely on any level of intellectual insight to understand or appreciate, the pictures of the people I am really drawn to are highly reliant on my audience being open to seeing something that they normally don't even register and having their attention drawn to it, ..and so it's been my belief that my Audience is infact not American at all. See Street photography has become about shooting the oddities and the highlights of the everyday or at least that's the premise; using the "everyday" as an excuse to make pictures of things that stand out of that "everyday" entity which really doesn't mean what it is in that context anymore. Look at the London Street Photography festival as it stands now, at 3 years old, and all of the pictures have a basic sameness to them and a sensationalism to them which irritates me now. Seattle street in a similar way has now got a formula too, which is fine, it's human nature and ultimately it's 'caretakered' itself, and its my baby but I feel like I have other avenues to grow.
